I found this to be a bit disorienting and sometimes find myself putting in what I think to be quarter notes when I am actually putting in entire bars. The piano roll is also simpler to use, FL Studio has this sort of stretchy effect where you can zoom in and out by pulling on the scroll bar. When you create a pattern in LMMS that pattern is locked into the slot on the song editor, and all you have to do is click everything into place. The Usability of each DAW is actually where I think LMMS wins bigtime. However I am not an audio engineer and am not going to dismiss the possibility that there is even more power within this software for those with the knowledge and motivation. The only reason I say almost is because FL makes the process more "fancy" and automates more of the process, especially with the flashy plugins. I initially thought this was a strength of FL but when I revisited LMMS I realized that it was actually almost as powerful. When I switched to FL I think the "Hi - Tech" enviornment motivated me to want more "Hi - Tech" sounds and I began taking adavantage of all the different mixing techniques and tutorials. When I first started with LMMS I was not interested in mastering at all (I knew nothing about it and never watched any tutorials or anything, I just wanted to make beats). I think my personal experience kind of forced my hand in this case. Mixing and Mastering is something that actually made me appreciate LMMS quite a bit. ZynAddSubFx (or however you spell that) is really similar to alot of paid plugins and plugins that come with FL, however the FL compatible ones (Nexus etc.) are more popular and contain presets you are more likely to have heard on the radio (that can be an advantage or disadvantage depending on how you look at it) I would say that, especially when talking about plugins that come with the softwware, LMMS is shockingly impressive for a free software. However I don't want to understate how powerful some of the plugins in LMMS are. I want to point out that a lot of what makes this aspect better in FL Studio is FL's popularity, the different types of technical difficulties you might come upon, and tricks you might find interesting have likely already been experienced and thoroughly discussed online because so many people use FL. However FL comes with a nice array of pre-loaded plugins like Gross-Beat, that are quite powerful. I don't want to say that LMMS isn't capable of accommodating these plugins because I am not super computer literate and it is possible that there are ways to make it work. The VST and Plugin Support is probably one of the biggest advantages to FL Studio I noticed immediately. Visually FL Studio is much prettier than LMMS, LMMS has a very stripped back retro-vibe while FL Studio has a very hi-tech look with lots of colors and graphics. Before I get into this I want to point out how impressed I've become with LMMS as a free software in comparison to the 200-300 dollar competitors I've been using LMMS for about 2 years and recently decided to try a paid DAW, specifically FL Studio, I wanted to talk a little bit about the differences I've noticed and give some insight to those of you who may be using LMMS as your DAW of choice, especially if it is your first one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |